<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Psychics &#8216;hired to find Bin Laden&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hamptonroadspub.com/blog/2007/02/25/psychics-hired-to-find-bin-laden/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hamptonroadspub.com/blog/2007/02/25/psychics-hired-to-find-bin-laden/</link>
	<description>News, notes, updates, and insights from the editors and staff of Hampton Roads Publishing Company</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 08:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bo Kindstrand</title>
		<link>http://www.hamptonroadspub.com/blog/2007/02/25/psychics-hired-to-find-bin-laden/#comment-5257</link>
		<dc:creator>Bo Kindstrand</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 08:48:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hamptonroadspub.com/blog/2007/02/25/psychics-hired-to-find-bin-laden/#comment-5257</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Here is a thoughtful "must read" from Paul H. Smith, addressing Britain's Ministry of Defense remote viewing research&lt;/i&gt; :

&lt;b&gt;They Think They Know&lt;/b&gt;

A few days ago when I first read the newspaper reports revealing that BritainÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s Ministry of Defense (MoD) had researched psychic skills, I started scribbling down a table-thumping rant about how wrong-headed the research had been Ã¢â‚¬â€œ not because it had been done at all (which I otherwise applaud) but because of how poorly-conceived it had been, at least according to the newspapers. Before I published my rant far and wide, someone fortunately pointed me to the actual 168-page declassified report, where I could read a more detailed account of what the MoD had actually done. I discovered that the news stories were embarrassingly oversimplified and incomplete, and that the research was not as ill-advised as reporters had claimed. It was still flawed, which I discuss below Ã¢â‚¬â€œ &lt;b&gt;but the whole affair amounts to the latest example of societyÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s self-perpetuating ignorance of the nature of Ã¢â‚¬Å“psychic phenomenaÃ¢â‚¬Â in general and remote viewing in particular&lt;/b&gt;.

&lt;b&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.rviewer.com/TheyThinkTheyKnow.pdf" rel="nofollow"&gt;Click here to read the 6 page article&lt;/a&gt;  [pdf format - 1.3 M] &lt;/b&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Here is a thoughtful &#8220;must read&#8221; from Paul H. Smith, addressing Britain&#8217;s Ministry of Defense remote viewing research</i> :</p>
<p><b>They Think They Know</b></p>
<p>A few days ago when I first read the newspaper reports revealing that BritainÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s Ministry of Defense (MoD) had researched psychic skills, I started scribbling down a table-thumping rant about how wrong-headed the research had been Ã¢â‚¬â€œ not because it had been done at all (which I otherwise applaud) but because of how poorly-conceived it had been, at least according to the newspapers. Before I published my rant far and wide, someone fortunately pointed me to the actual 168-page declassified report, where I could read a more detailed account of what the MoD had actually done. I discovered that the news stories were embarrassingly oversimplified and incomplete, and that the research was not as ill-advised as reporters had claimed. It was still flawed, which I discuss below Ã¢â‚¬â€œ <b>but the whole affair amounts to the latest example of societyÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s self-perpetuating ignorance of the nature of Ã¢â‚¬Å“psychic phenomenaÃ¢â‚¬Â in general and remote viewing in particular</b>.</p>
<p><b><a href="http://www.rviewer.com/TheyThinkTheyKnow.pdf" rel="nofollow">Click here to read the 6 page article</a>  [pdf format - 1.3 M] </b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
