The Question of Iran
Michael Ventura’s column is as always thought-provoking. I suggest that you read and then re-read his initial paragraph. Would that the maladministration would!
Then, look at the facts he so concisely marshals: size, cohesion, history,and strategic relationships. And, in words I might have penned myself, “Thanks to Bush and his enablers the world is very, very tired of us.”
From the Austin Chronicle.
The Question of Iran
The major nations hated but tolerated the U.S. invasion of Iraq. Their interests were not directly threatened, so they could afford toleration. China, in particular, subsidized the Bush invasion with substantial loans because it’s in China’s interests for the U.S. to lose credibility, overtax its military and undermine its economy through such debacles as Iraq. Iran, however, is a very different story and for some reason that story is not being told.
The information is available in newspapers, yet even columnists on those papers — and every politician, military analyst, and TV commentator I’m aware of — seem ignorant of crucial facts. They speak of Iran within the story-line the White House has established: Iran’s interference in Iraq, Iran’s development of nukes, Iran’s extremism toward Israel, Iran’s support of Hezbullah and Hamas, and Iran’s desire to be the major player in the region — the familiar (and largely true) headlines, all of which seem to be leading to a U.S.-Iran confrontation. But Iran is not Iraq.